Daily legal news, podcast and major update to UK blogs is now up on Insite Law. Story of The Day “ The Independent reports that The full extent of state powers to detain people without charge, cover up Government errors, hold the DNA of the innocent and share personal data between public bodies has been revealed in a devastating analysis of the erosion of civil liberties in Britain over the past decade. Almost 60 new powers contained in more than 25 Acts of Parliament have whittled away at freedoms and broken pledges set out in the Human Rights Act and Magna Carta, according to a new audit of laws introduced since Labour came to power in 1997. The dossier, compiled by the Convention on Modern Liberty, criticises police powers to detain terror suspects for 28 days without charge, new stop-and-search powers handed to police (allowing them to stop people without reason at airports and other designated areas), and restrictions on the right of peaceful protest. It is the first time such a picture of the erosion of rights under Labour has been published. The rise in surveillance in Britain is also documented, including new laws allowing individuals to be electronically tagged, and the legal interception of letters, emails and phone calls.”

View original post here:
20th February: Daily Legal news etc up on Insite Law

Leave your Comment

Daily legal news and podcast up on Insite Law.  New Law Reports section (Click link on header) Issue #3 of the Insite Law Newswire is also up on Insite Law |  S ign up to get your Free email version.

More:
16th February: Daily News Podcast up on Insite Law

Leave your Comment

Curiously, I was at a loss for something to do this morning so I took a trip to the Moon , fully reported on Twitter - where else! Frankly, we would all probably be freer if we were on the Moon these days given the present governments taste for CCTV cameras, ID cards, promulgating new criminal offences and Robocop thinking when it comes to controlling the British people. The latest stunt being pulled by the government in the dying days of their 12 year “Protectorate” ( taste precluded me from using the rather more emotive “Reich”)  is the plan in the Welfare Reform Bill in the House of Commons committee stage this to week to allow the newly renamed Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission to take away the driving licences and passports of parents who refuse to pay for their children - without a court order. As The Law Society Gazette reported: ” Justice Director Roger Smith described the ‘disproportionate’ sanctions as the thin end of the wedge.  They are sure to creep into others areas of dispute once the link between the method of enforcement and what’s at stake is broken.” Another stunt pulled by the government was to jail parents for the truancy of their children. The BBC reported this week: “A parent is jailed for their child’s truancy once a fortnight every school term in England and Wales, analysis of court statistics shows.” This plan was a big FAIL. One wonders if this idea was dreamed up when half the Cabinet were smoking cannabis. Child doesn’t go to school. Jail parent.  Child goes into care if from a one parent family, possibly brutalised by the experience and less receptive to school than before and taxpayer picks up bill for high cost of imprisoning parents. Clever stuff. The BBC dredges up ex-minister Estelle Smith and sundry Lib-Dems to wring their hands and undergo ritual atonement and exculpation.  I can’t even be bothered to quote from the report. I’m with the ex-Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, on this one.  We have far too many criminal laws, far too much political interference with the Judiciary, way too many CCTV cameras, irritating regulations, cash raising fine schemes and interferences in our lives in this once green and pleasant land. So…pouring a libation to my taste… on to the other matters of the week… At a loss for something to do this Sunday morning, I decided to make a moon landing. This was reported fully on Twitter of course - where else? I was also able to do my 100th podcast with my friend Dan Hull, a lawyer in the United States , who can be relied upon to be robust, controversial and to the point. We talked of many things including the future of lawyers post recession. Geert Wilders tried to hit our shores to show his film to a group of peers in The House of Lords. He was frustrated in this endeavour by the Home Secretary who banned him from entry on grounds, inter alia, that Lord Ahmed had indicated there would be 10,000 muslims on the streets.  Wilders ignored the letter and arrived at Heathrow to be excluded by Immigration and Border Agency officers. I did a podcast with Carl Gardner who believes that the Home Secretary acted unlawfully .  I agree with his analysis.  Rather more worrying….  this exclusion was yet another example of our government believing they know best.  It was a shameful decision;  riding roughshod, whatever one may think of Wilders, over the reputation of this country to handle difficulty with debate, with reason, with parody, ridicule and mockery - rather than the blunt bludgeon of the law - misunderstood, possibly, in this case.  10,000 muslims did not turn up at Heathrow or stampede on our streets -  possibly because they are more rational than Lord Ahmed. It is not Thunderbirds are GO for Alistair Darling on the banks lending front , nor, it would seem, on the issue of his own expenses.  Guido Fawkes jumps on the story with his usual enthusiasm. I quote: “When the man in charge of the nation’s finances, Alistair Darling, has been caught fiddling his expenses , and Jacqui Smith, the woman who is in charge of crime prevention is accused of corruption , you have a government which is a kleptocracy. The New Labour promise to be “whiter than white” is like a sick joke now.” Another week begins tomorrow.  I shall be at my post, watching our shores, checking the Thames for U-Boats and French Ships of the Line… I shall be back.  Have a good one. Regards as always

Continued here:
Sunday 15th February: Postcard from The Moon

Leave your Comment

Welcome to my 100th Podcast interview with movers, shakers, practitioners and pundits from  the wonderful world of law… practice and academe. Today I am talking to Dan Hull, founder of Hull McGuire PC with Julie McGuire. Dan, A litigator and lobbyist with life-long professional ties to Washington, D.C practices in the areas of commercial litigation (primarily U.S. federal courts and ADR abroad), environmental law, employment practices law, and legislative affairs.  He is also the founder of the well known and well regarded WhatAbout Clients? Blog which, at weekends turns itself into the WhatAboutParis? Blog. We talk about The credit-crunch - law firm redundancies - the ‘knowledge gap’ - the Billable hour v Flat fee controversy and even talk about Geeklawyer. Listen to Podcast 100 *** Podcast version for iTunes

View original post here: 
Podcast 100: Podcast 100: Dan Hull the credit-crunch, law firms and the future

Leave your Comment

12th February: Daily legal news, blogs and podcast up on Insite Law *** Do you want my FREE newswire?  Filled with useful stuff! Sign up for Free weekly email newswire | Read Issue #2 of the Newswire. | Series of Podcasts for Bar students.

Read more:
12th February: Daily Legal News and Podcast up on Insite Law

Leave your Comment

11th February: Daily legal news, blogs and podcast up on Insite Law *** Do you want my FREE newswire?  Filled with useful stuff! Sign up for Free weekly email newswire | Read Issue #2 of the Newswire. | Series of Podcasts for Bar students. The Times reports that A senior female executive at a City bank headed by the new Trade Minister was a victim of sexism in a department where meetings ended up in strip clubs, an employment tribunal was told yesterday.Anna Atkins said that she was passed over for promotion at Standard Chartered because of a macho culture where late-night drinking was encouraged…. see Insite Law for more details of late night lap ancing and cigar smoking in the news section of the front page…

See the original post here:
11th February: Daily News and podcast up on Insite Law

Leave your Comment

Podcast 98: Neville Hobson on Communication, PR, Twitter and other social media. Today I am talking to Neville Hobson, a communicator, blogger and podcaster, one of the leading European early adopters and influencers in social media communication for business. He is an IABC-accredited communication practitioner with over 25 years’ experience in public and media relations, marketing communication, employee, compensation and benefits communication as well as investor and financial relations. He helps companies use effective communication to achieve their business goals. I’m going to ask him how communication can help companies and law firms in today’s climate. We talk about Twitter, Facebook, Linked-in and the future… Listen to Podcast 98 *** Podcast version for iTunes       

Go here to see the original: 
Podcast 98: Neville Hobson on Communication, PR, Twitter and other social media.

Leave your Comment

Today I am talking to Alexander Learmonth, Chairman of The Young Barristers Committee of the Bar Council. Called in 2000, Alex is a member of NewSquare Chambers . I talk to Alex about the realities facing  young members of the bar and his advice for students contemplating a career at the bar or who are doing the BVC now and the prospects for pupillage and tenancy. [Pic: Marcus Lyon] Listen to Podcast 96: Alexander Learmonth, Chairman, Young Barristers Committee of The Bar Council *** Podcast 96 link for iTunes       

Excerpt from: 
Podcast 96: Alexander Learmonth, Chairman, Young Barristers Committee of The Bar Council

Leave your Comment

Daily news update and news podcast up on Insite Law. Well… it is unlikely to be *Sir* Jeremy Clarkson at any time in the near future after Clarkson began his State Visit to Australia by slagging off the Prime Mentalist, Gordon Brown.  Clarkson, a national treasure who drives fast cars like a hooligan on too many e-numbers (to the delight of the nation’s petrol heads), described Brown as a “one eyed Sottish idiot” and accused him of lying to the British public about the world economy.  Various Scots MPs were pulled from their beds/offices etc to express outrage.  All this… and more is covered today on Insite Law’s news update…. Read I am able to report that I had a great lunch yesterday with John Bolch , Jacqui Gilliat from 4 Brick Court and her pupil Ella Shaw yesterday in Maidstone. The meet up - or should I say *Tweet Up* was arranged over Twitter.  It was a civilised affair.  Jacqui ( Author of the Bloody Relations blog ) , having completed her court case at the Maidstone Law Courts, suggested that we might take of the wines of the Gods.  It will come as no surprise to readers that I was easily persuaded to this course of action and Rioja arived, as if by magic, at our table… several bottles of the stuff, as it happens. I am doing a podcast at high noon today with Alexander Learmonth, Chairman of The Young Barrister’s Committee to talk about the realities facing young barristers in today’s financial climate and to talk about prospects for students seeking pupillage and tenancies over the next couple of years.  With this in mind, I invited Jacqui Gilliatt’s pupil, Ella Shaw, to do a podcast on this very theme.  I’m pleased to report that she accepted the invitation and I will record the podcast with her on Sunday. And finally… I’ve got my accounts sorted… by using an excellent accounts package I found online called KashFlow. It works on both Mac and PC, works online for Mac users (Important for me) and is astonishingly easy to use - even for a law blogger.  So… if you are a lawyer, blogger, freelance lecturer or just a bon viveur whose accounts are in a  black plastic bin bag - may I encourage you to try the 60 day FREE trial and get your accounts sorted to professional standards.  It also has a most useful *Email the invoice* function - joy!.  I make no apology for being an opportunist.  Noticing that the CEO of Kashflow is on Twitter, I asked Duane Jackson  if he would care to sponsor my daily news podcasts and support my free online magazine by buying a small, modestly priced, advert.  I work on the principle for my free onlne mag that if *You don’t ask, you don’t get*.  Duane Jackson was prepared to do this - which I appreciate. If you need to sort your acounts - I have no hesitation in commending Kashflow to you - and did so on Twitter even before I came up with the idea of asking Duane to sponsor my daily news podcasts! Try Kashflow FREE for 60 days?       

Continued here: 
6th February: News up and Jeremy Clarkson starts state visit to Australia…

Leave your Comment

What the Proposed Changes to the UK Equality Law Mean to You
By Iain Mackintosh

Last week, Harriet Harman announced new equality laws to tackle widespread discrimination. Under these new plans, age discrimination would be removed from all aspects of society, and further changes would be made to prevent workplaces from discriminating against minorities. There is also room for ‘positive action’ that allows business to hire women or minorities without fear of legal action if the candidates are equal in terms of ability.

But how do these changes to the equality law differ from how we act now?

What is actually so different?

The main points of the proposed bill are that:

- Business will be allowed to discriminate in favour of ethnicities and genders underrepresented in their place of work if interview candidates were of equal ability.

- Clauses in contracts that prevent staff discussing their wages with colleagues will be scrapped.

- Age discrimination laws will be widened to encompass the world outside the workplace.

There are also proposals on the table to make public bodies publish the pay gap within their organisations.

Why is the new system being introduced?

The new discrimination laws are being proposed in order to make a more balanced workforce in Britain, hence employers will be able to discriminate in favour of one group ahead of another given two equally matched candidates to diversify their work environment (contrary to tabloid implication, this actually works both ways, and a predominantly female office would be allowed to discriminate in favour of a male candidate).

The section affecting the wages of companies is being included to try and reduce the massive pay gap between men and women on business contracts. Although the gap has narrowed in recent years according to official figures, on average women still only earn 87p for every £1 that men earn. One of the statistics that Harriet Harman has used is that female part-time workers earn up to 40% less than their full time male counterparts. By making companies more open about their wage structures, it is hoped that the gap will close naturally.

Finally, the laws affecting age are aimed at tackling the discrimination people feel based on their age in their daily lives.

Isn’t discriminating against age already illegal?

While workplace age discrimination has been legislated against since 2006, the proposed new equality laws are intended to tackle wider forms of ageism. This is planned to tackle the often costly discrimination that pensioners face in their daily life, from high insurance premiums to doctors putting illnesses down to their age and refusing treatment.

What are the main caveats of the new law?

The important things to bear in mind when thinking on the prospective changes are:

- Firms may be forced to publish pay rates

- Positive action is only an option in interviews where candidates are equally matched and will not be compulsory in any event.

- Some areas will likely be exempt from the age discrimination laws, such as free bus passes for the elderly and holidays for the over 50s and 18-30s.

Given the uproar that’s been made against the positive action section of the bill, it’s not guaranteed that every part of the bill will ever become law. Even if it does become law, it’s almost impossible to put a stop of workplace discrimination, because you can’t know with any certainty what an employer’s reason for passing over a candidate is. For most of us, this legislation will mean very little to our business contracts, and we can carry on picking the best candidate for the job regardless of gender, ethnicity, sexuality or age.

Iain Mackintosh is the managing director of Simply-Docs. The firm provides over 1100 business contracts covering all aspects of business from holiday entitlement to non-disclosure agreements. By providing these legal documents (with content provided by leading commercial lawyers, HR and health & safety consultants) at an affordable price, the company intends to help small businesses avoid costly breaches of regulation and legal action.

Courtesy: Local Solicitors | Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Iain_Mackintosh

*****************

Personal Injury Claims Glossary of Terms
By Rich Bendall

Definitions and explanations of terms commonly associated with making a Personal Injury claim in the UK.

Advocacy

Advocacy is the official term for when a solicitor or barrister acts on the behalf of a client in a court of law.

Barrister

A barrister is a member of the legal profession who specialises in representing clients in court.

Burden of Proof

In Personal Injury claims the burden of proof rests with the claimant. It is up to the person making the claim to prove that the alleged responsible party was at fault for the injuries caused.

Claim

A claim occurs when a person demands financial compensation for injuries that have been suffered and for any subsequent loses e.g. loss of earnings etc

Counter Claim

A fairly uncommon situation in personal injury cases where the defendant (person being held liable) makes their own claim against the injured party in response to their legal action.

Damages

The financial reward received by a person who has made a successful personal injury claim.

Duty of Care

Duty of Care is a person’s responsibility to act in a way that is not likely to cause harm to others. If the actions of an individual or group are not made with due care and attention their actions are considered negligent.

Fast Track

In the English and Welsh legal system fast track cases are claims for compensation of between £1000 and £15000. The majority of personal injury claims are covered by the fast track system.

Interim Payments

In some personal injury cases a proportion of the damages may be paid out before the claim is officially settled. These interim payments are deducted from the final amount of compensation awarded.

Legal Aid

Legal Aid is a public fund that enables people to use legal services that they would otherwise have been unable to afford.

Negligence

Negligence occurs when there has been judged to have been a breech in a person’s duty of care. For a successful personal injury claim the claimant must prove that their injuries were caused as a result of the negligence of the defendant.

No Win No Fee

A legal system that forms the basis of the majority of personal injury claims in which if the injured party is not successful in their claim then they will not be asked to pay any legal fees.

Solicitor

A solicitor is a qualified individual that provides a range of legal advice to clients in the UK.

Success Fees

The fee that a solicitor is entitled to claim if they are successful in a personal injury case.

JMS are a firm of personal injury solicitors based in Manchester, UK. Visit our website to find out more about making a personal injury claim.

Article Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Rich_Bendall

********************

Consult Child Support Lawyers in Children-Related Legal Issues
By Sridhar Duncanlewis

Frightened by the prospects of meeting a lawyer? It is quite a daunting task for many people to approach the right lawyers for their cases. The parameters for consultancy, fees, expertise and the gender generally appear to be mixed up for most people. Increasingly, the needs for assistance of child support lawyers are gaining importance. As legal decisions influence the lives of young children in the family, every parent looks for the best child support lawyers.

As people from different countries consider migration to the UK, they rarely
know what could hit them when they require Child Custody Lawyers for consultation. Of course the Internet provides many firms dealing in child custodial issues. But how will parents agree what is best and make the child feel comfortable? With the increase in ethnic groups in UK, and English language still a barrier for many, complex legal issues can arise from time to time. The Duncan Lewis firm started in 1998 and caters to many complex legal issues. It has been growing steadily, as clients find comfort levels high and prefer their professional services.

Preparing to meet the lawyer is important and with the right testimonials, a child support lawyer can be approached from this law firm. The firm is well versed in the UK laws and specializes in dealing with child custodial issues. Having technical knowledge to help our clients is a vantage point for the law firm. With effective communication more than half the case is won. The firm provides expert child support lawyers who have handled complex cases successfully. Once you have been able to explain your problem, they will able to guide in the right direction. Right from the filing of the application to hearing to the logical conclusion the child support lawyer will be in charge. In UK, biological parents still have to pay for child support even if they have other guardians. Different jurisdictions may have different laws, but an effective child support lawyer will be able to put up the case confidently. One can also take help of child support agencies if required.

Sridhar is an experienced writer with expertise in Child Care Law, Child Support Solicitation and other Legal Services in London.

Duncan Lewis is the largest law firm that caters for Child Support, Child Custody laws, Family Law, child custody and child abduction laws. Find child support lawyers, child custody lawyers and child custody attorneys among many other specialist lawyers. This London based firm has a large and enthusiastic staff to help with any hurdle that may be encountered. Find knowledgeable child support lawyers to get you justice.

Article Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Sridhar_Duncanlewis

********************

Conditional Fee Agreements and Personal Injury Solicitors
By Nicholas Jervis

Conditional Fee Agreements - What Do They Mean To You?

Conditional Fee Agreements were introduced when the right to receive legal aid was removed from personal injury claims. Realising that the removal may cause uproar with the public the Government was keen to introduce some form of protection that would allow accident victims to make a personal injury claim without having to spend thousands of pounds to do so. The Conditional Fee Agreement was the result.

No Win No Fee Agreements?

Conditional Fee Agreements (CFA) are often referred to as “No Win No Fee Agreements”. This is not their correct name. A CFA is a legal document that allows you to make a personal injury claim on the basis that you do not have to pay legal fees as the claim continues, but that you are expected to pay them when the claim finishes. However, what happens at the end of the claim if it is successful is that the solicitor is entitled to recover his charges/costs from the other person’s insurance company as well as claiming your compensation. If you lose the claim the CFA being in place means you do not have to pay any costs (that is the No Win No Fee part).

Why Should You Sign One?

The CFA is a long and ultimately dull document to read, but without it a solicitor cannot recover their costs from the other side as there will be no legal entitlement to do so, and if they can’t be paid for their work they are unlikely to take a personal injury claim on. Hundreds, probably even thousands, of Conditional Fee Agreements are signed every day without any problems. Whilst it would be preferable for the agreement to be shortened considerably, ultimately it is just one of those documents that is needed in today’s personal injury claims world. The upside to signing a conditional fee agreement is that you can make your personal injury claim, receive your compensation (all of it if you are using an ethical claims company and solicitor) and the solicitor will be paid for all of the time spent working on your case by the insurance company. If you do not sign it, a solicitor is very unlikely to be able to help you.

Nicholas Jervis is a personal injury solicitor (non-practising) and a director of 1stClaims.co.uk, a claims company which connects innocent personal injury and medical negligence victims with expert personal injury and medical negligence solicitors at no cost to the individual. Read more about Conditional Fee Agreements?

Article Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nicholas_Jervis

*******************

Will the Credit Crunch Close Down Conveyancing Solicitors
By Wayne Kevin Roberts

There was an interesting story on the radio the other day about the effect of the credit crunch on Estate Agents. The DJ then went on to say “Just to think, there are now thousands of Conveyancing Solicitors sat around twiddling their thumbs.” He then delivered the punch line “No change there.” What was surprising about this was that although it is common knowledge that the Credit Crunch is taking its toll on Estate Agents, its effect on Conveyancing Solicitors is something we very rarely hear about.

The sad fact of the matter is that law firms can not afford to pay Conveyancing Solicitors or any other member of staff to be sat around twiddling their thumbs. Since the start of the Credit Crunch in September 2007 there are now less than half the number of conveyancing transactions and therefore less than half the amount of work for Conveyancers. Every conveyancing firm has been affected by this. Some firms have been able to transfer staff into other departments however many have had to make redundancies. Last month the Law Society Gazette reported that recruitment agencies were becoming inundated with Conveyancers and Conveyancing Solicitors who had been made redundant.

Up until August 2007 Conveyancers were in great demand which was reflected in their remuneration packages. However, many are now being made redundant, suffering pay cuts or faced with extremely poor job security. It is difficult to recall in recent times any other trade or profession to be devalued by so much in such a short period. It is not just the staff employed in the profession who are suffering but those who have spent years training to become Conveyancing Solicitors or Licensed Conveyancers, many now find the skills they have obtaining are practically worthless.

Many Conveyancing Solicitors Firms are in a fortunate position of being able to downsize. However, many smaller solicitors offices and sole practitioners who are entirely dependent on conveyancing work are unable to take such action. They now face a difficult decision as to whether or not it is worth carrying on or closing down. Very few Solicitors have closed down so far. The reason for this is that they have insurance until 30th September 2008. However the cost of insurance for conveyancing firms is set to increase considerably as it is predicted that the drop in house prices will cause more negligence claims against Conveyancing Solicitors.

The problem is compounded by the introduction of Home Information Packs (HIPs) in August 2007. Their aim was to speed up the Conveyancing process, however their effect has been to put the commission of the HIP into the hands of the selling agent. They are now able to direct the client as to who should be preparing the pack and therefore influence which Solicitor carries out the Conveyancing. Many Conveyancing Solicitors now find it difficult to determine to what extent they have lost their work as a result of the credit crunch or due to the Introduction of HIPs.

Conveyancing Firms also face another obstacle from what is known as ‘run off’ insurance. This is an additional insurance premium that a Solicitors Office must pay if they close down without a successor practice. Nobody wants to buy or take over a conveyancing firm at the moment! The run off premium is usually between 200 - 225% of the initial premium. By way of an example:-

A Conveyancing Solicitors firm paid their indemnity insurance premium of £20,000 for October 2007 to September 2008. If they wish to close down before 30th September 2008 they will have to pay an additional ‘run off’ premium of £45,000. This would be quite an incentive not to close down but to continue trading. However, reports suggest that their insurance premium will increase by at least 25% which would mean that they would have to pay £25,000 to insure between October 2008 and September 2009. To compound matters nearly all predictions are for the housing market to continue to slow down and therefore increase the chances of them closing down next year. They would then have to pay a ‘run off’ premium of 225% of the higher premium. In this example the solicitors firm would have to pay an additional £56,250 ‘run off’ insurance premium on top of their £25,000 premium should they close down next year. A rather worrying £81,250 in total.

The true effect of the credit crunch on Conveyancing Solicitors is not yet known. On 1st October 2008 it will be interesting to see exactly how many have decided to run the risk of trading for another year and how many Solicitors Firms close down.

Wayne Roberts LL.B Hons

Wayne Roberts is the owner and founder of Roberts Solicitors and Online Conveyancing Solicitors Read the original article and others at the Online Conveyancing Solicitors Property Advice Centre

Article Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Wayne_Kevin_Roberts


The content and materials provided in this web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to supplement or comprise any precise facts, although we have researched sufficiently for the facts and information to be reasonably accurate. All content and materials including research papers, case studies and testimonials summarizing facts have been done by individuals working for this website. We cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies, as we have described that information is for educational purposes and therefore maybe a few weeks old.

Copyright 1991 - 2008 (online 2002)

Leave your Comment